The EU and Singapore meet regularly to discuss issues and best practices in the implementation of the agreement. The committees meet regularly. The Commission started discussions in the hope of a swift conclusion by the end of 2011, given that Singapore already had a number of free trade agreements – notably with the US, China, Japan and India – and that it is a port of freedom with relatively low tariffs and regulatory barriers. According to her, the ALER would allow trade committees, without democratic legitimacy, to take decisions on issues that profoundly influence the lives of European citizens, such as food labelling and the liberalisation of services. They therefore consider that the Singapore Agreement violates the Basic Law. More democracy, Campact and foodwatch are calling not only for the Bundestag to have the right to approve or reject trade agreements such as the EU`s agreement with Singapore, but also to clearly define which competences and rights should be transferred to the EU committees. Otherwise, democracy will be weakened and the European Union will lose the trust of its citizens. The organisations believe that the decision of the constitutional judges in Karlsruhe will have a decisive influence on how the EU decides on trade agreements in the future. The free trade agreement provides for 70 years of copyright protection. Producers based in Singapore may collect broadcasting and public performance royalties for productions exported to the EU.

The pioneering trade agreement between the European Union and Singapore, which votes on almost all tariffs between the two jurisdictions, comes into force today. According to an opinion of the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) in Luxembourg, the original NAFTA was a so-called mixed agreement. The opinion was requested by the European Commission, which wanted to confirm whether the EU institutions alone were empowered to conclude the agreement without each member state being a party to the agreement. [8] The ECJ`s opinion led the European Commission to divide the agreement into a free trade agreement and an investment protection agreement. Lee added that Singapore hopes the deal will ultimately result in a free trade agreement between the EU and ASEAN, which will improve connectivity between the EU, the world`s largest internal market, and ASEAN, which is expected to become the world`s fourth largest economic bloc by 2030. “Let us be clear, the constitutional challenge is not directed against the European Union or international trade,” said Roman Huber, Federal President for Affairs at Mehr Demokratie. “However, if the EU succeeds in implementing its eu-only strategy, the ALER will be followed by dozens of other agreements that deny member states` parliaments a say on crucial issues. This weakens democracy in Europe. On 19 October 2018, three agreements were signed between the parties, namely the EU-Singapore Trade Agreement, the EU-Singapore Investment Protection Agreement and the Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation. [5] [6] The agreement was subsequently approved by the European Parliament on 13 February 2019. [7] On 8 November 2019, it was announced that the agreement will enter into force on 21 November 2019.

. . .